The Rising Flame of Community Engagement
Where
Talks
Disobey 2024
Duration
40 min
Explains how trust turns loose professional networks into communities, using a Nordic financial sharing group and Women for Cyber as examples.
Summary
The talk opens with a question: what separates a community from a network? The speaker describes a network as a looser, more transactional set of relationships where people mostly receive, while a community asks members to contribute, take part and share a sense of belonging and a common purpose. Drawing on social psychology, the talk argues that trust is the foundation that lets that sense of community form, because members accept vulnerability on the expectation that others will not exploit it.
The middle section tests this with two case studies. The first is a cross-border partnership of Nordic financial institutions, founded in 2017, where competing banks agree not to compete on cyber defence. Members share threat intelligence, support one another during incidents and bring in public bodies and law enforcement, which gives smaller firms with thin security teams access to insight and tools they could not afford alone. The second is Women for Cyber, a European network that aims to diversify the field through upskilling and by correcting misconceptions about cyber careers. The speaker frames the benefits of such communities as reciprocation, having a trusted sparring partner, a sense of belonging, and time to reflect and learn after a crisis.
The closing advice is practical. Individuals should join a local community even before they can contribute much, and start one if none exists. Organisations, particularly small and mid-sized ones, should build on relationships they already have, make a business case around shared interests and cost savings, and take the initiative rather than wait for others to drive collaboration.
Related talks
Talks·48 min
Kate Collins
Presents a leadership creed for info-sec professionals, using The Mandalorian to illustrate principles for leading people and teams.
Talks·36 min
Argues that understanding other people works better through empathy than through assuming you can read their minds.


