Social Engineering the Social Engineers: How To Not Suck at Buying Software
Where
Talks
RVAsec 13
Duration
41 min
Explains how security tools are bought and sold, and where buyers and sellers commonly go wrong.
Summary
David Girvin opens with his move from hands-on offensive security into the vendor side, going from pen testing and security leadership roles to working as a sales engineer. He frames the talk as a look at how security tools get purchased, seen from both the buyer's seat and the seller's, and argues that each side misreads the other's incentives. He walks through the sales pipeline in order: prospecting by sales development reps, discovery calls, proof-of-value trials, executive alignment, and procurement and pricing. Along the way he explains how compensation shapes behavior and why pricing complex platforms takes real discovery work.
The middle of the talk focuses on pitfalls. Buyers are urged to build a scorecard before evaluating, to confirm they have data access and staff time for a proof of value, and to define scope and success criteria in a shared document. He warns against vague marketing claims, hidden costs, curated sandbox trials that do not reflect real conditions, and buying one broad tool on the promise that it fixes everything. He also recommends asking partners and resellers whose interests they actually serve.
He closes by urging buyers to be candid about budget and decision authority, and sellers to be open about product limits. The takeaway is that a mutually beneficial deal holds up better than one won through pressure, and that a practitioner who understands the other side's constraints can negotiate outcomes that work for everyone involved.
Related talks
Talks·48 min
Luke McOmie
Argues that enterprise security should run as a continuous, business-driven program rather than annual checkbox testing.
Talks·44 min
Karl Jankowski
Examines how network assessments get misused as quick fixes and outlines governance basics small businesses can follow instead.
Talks·51 min
Casey Beaumont
Explains how security metrics can reward noise and activity, and how to measure real risk reduction instead.


