#NahamCon2022 - @codingo: Recon Fundamentals by Example
Reviews #NahamCon2022 - @codingo: Recon Fundamentals by Example and evaluates key implications for security practitioners.
Summary
Recon taxonomy
Michael Bazzell expands his recon-fundamentals framework: wide recon maps organizational attack surface (domains, assets); narrow recon drills into one target (directory brute force, parameter tampering). Active testing sends requests that create logs; passive testing uses third-party caches without touching the target.
Tool classification
Tools are not binary—Subfinder and Amass support both passive OSINT and active modes, with design intent differing. Proxies like Kaido, Burp, and ZAP are typically narrow-active; ffuf spans narrow and wide active testing. Understanding intent helps manage scope, rate limits, and operational noise.
Emerging tooling
He highlights TruffleHog's safe active verification of passively found secrets, the Kaido proxy, SecurityTrails SQL explorer, and related tools as worth adopting. Bugcrowd's triage lead stresses cataloging behavior over labels when choosing recon stacks for bug bounty or red team work.
Related talks
NahamCon·35 min
Evaluates #NahamCon2022 - @infosec_au: Finding 0days in Enterprise Web Applications and evaluates key implications for security practitioners.
NahamCon·28 min
Examines #Nahamcon2022 - @areyou1or0: Reversing Web Assembly (wasm) and evaluates key implications for security practitioners.
Videos·40 min
Presenters detail vulnerability discovery and exploitation in Attack surfaces of smart medical infrastructure by Denis Makrushin (@difezza).


