Skip to content

DEF CON 34 talks are here: 354 talks, summarized and searchable.

Browse DEF CON 34

Arizona Elections Security Prep

Michael MooreIvan ZhelevRyan MurrayNate YoungAngie ClaerJerry KeeleyDana LewisLester GodySean TrackmanKen Ma

PolicyTrack 11 hr 3 minBeginnerOpen on YouTube ↗

Where

Track 1
CactusCon 12

Duration

1 hr 3 min

Arizona election officials and their partners describe physical and cyber protections and threat sharing ahead of the 2024 general election.

Summary

A panel of Arizona election officials, state and federal security staff, and a private-sector election vendor describes how they are preparing for the 2024 general election. The session opens with the legal framework behind elections in the state, where counties run their own processes under a bottom-up model. The state office explains its role: visiting all fifteen counties to share security practices, running a monthly statewide election security meeting, and acting as a liaison to law enforcement.

The discussion then turns to the threats election staff receive, including suspicious powder in the mail, bomb threats against several offices at once, and swatting. Panelists stress reporting these incidents so that the state fusion center can spot patterns across jurisdictions. The homeland security and federal representatives described cyber assessments of county election offices, shared telemetry across the state, tabletop exercises, and help for smaller jurisdictions that lack staff. Procedural controls such as seals, two-person handling, camera coverage, and livestreamed processes were presented as ways to build transparency. Social media was highlighted as both an intelligence source and a driver of physical risk.

The panel repeatedly named misinformation, deepfakes, insider risk from staff turnover, and threats to personal safety as their biggest concerns. Closing advice for attendees was to check claims against official sources, talk with election workers, and report threats. For practitioners, the useful takeaways are the value of standing relationships with local officials and the case for cross-jurisdiction information sharing.

Related talks