A Review of Post Election Audits in Swing States
Evaluates the effectiveness, rigor, and reliability of post-election audits conducted across seven closely contested swing states following the 2024 election.
Summary
The Essential Criteria for Effective Post-Election Audits
Post-election audits serve as a critical public check on election outcomes, requiring transparent, trustworthy, and statistically meaningful evidence to verify that machine counts accurately reflect voter intent.
Evaluating Swing State Audits After the 2024 Election
Susan Greenhalgh presents an exhaustive review of post-election auditing procedures conducted across seven battleground swing states, analyzing whether statutory audit rules meet rigorous evidentiary standards.
Gaps in Current State Auditing Practices
Many state-mandated audits suffer from limited sample sizes, reliance on machine re-scans rather than hand counts, and lack of public observation, diminishing their ability to detect subtle tabulation anomalies.
Policy Recommendations for Trustworthy Audits
Strengthening post-election confidence requires states to mandate robust Risk-Limiting Audits of paper ballots, ensure transparent public access, and establish clear recount triggers.
Related talks
Voting Village·58 min
Philip Stark
Election auditing pioneer Philip Stark details how Risk-Limiting Audits (RLAs) provide statistical verification of paper ballots while warning against auditing untrustworthy vote records.
Voting Village·28 min
Marnie Mahoney
Examines regulatory and certification failures surrounding Ballot Marking Devices, focusing on barcode vote encoding and ballot image discrepancies.
Voting Village·44 min
Ron Rivest
Turing Award winner Ron Rivest explains software independence and evidence-based elections as foundational principles for securing democratic processes.


